Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Mining & energy

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Mining & energy Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,484 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Missoula, MT$9.1B+10.2%+0.9%$56.9k$74.2k0.162.6%-2.7%16 km245 km+5.877.0 Blount, TN$9.1B+10.4%+1.2%$61.1k$63.3k—2.6%-4.0%17 km28 km+4.574.2 Jackson, MI$9.1B+7.5%-0.1%$59.7k$51.6k0.375.2%-3.3%3 km85 km+4.276.5 Macon, IL$9.1B+7.3%-0.9%$67.1k$61.4k—5.6%-3.4%5 km97 km+8.483.3 Alamance, NC$9.0B+7.5%+1.7%$51.0k$54.2k0.143.6%-4.3%2 km198 km+18.577.1 Wayne, OH$9.0B+7.2%-0.1%$55.9k$61.0k1.642.5%-2.8%20 km73 km+7.664.9 Ontario, NY$8.9B+7.6%+0.1%$61.5k$68.5k0.143.5%-5.9%14 km49 km+4.263.5 Carroll, MD$8.9B+7.8%+0.6%$55.5k$78.7k—2.8%-1.6%19 km40 km+5.659.5 Madera, CA$8.8B+8.1%+1.5%$53.7k$51.2k—7.0%-2.9%98 km158 km+9.596.4 Lincoln, SD$8.8B+12.0%+3.4%$63.1k$91.9k—1.7%-1.2%6 km98 km+4.463.0 Portage, OH$8.8B+7.0%+0.2%$55.6k$59.4k0.762.9%-3.0%7 km52 km+10.765.1 Newport, RI$8.8B+8.2%-0.6%$66.8k$95.0k—2.9%-4.8%16 km8 km+9.836.4 Pueblo, CO$8.8B+7.4%+0.3%$54.3k$51.5k0.415.1%+0.3%10 km794 km+5.282.5 Pennington, SD$8.7B+8.8%+1.5%$54.9k$78.5k0.491.9%-1.5%11 km550 km+6.078.6 Charles, MD$8.7B+8.7%+1.1%$59.0k$70.2k0.204.3%-1.9%28 km16 km+10.444.1 Bartow, GA$8.6B+13.0%+1.9%$54.8k$53.4k0.743.0%-4.4%4 km99 km+6.865.3 Grant, WA$8.6B+9.2%+1.3%$60.3k$52.2k—6.1%-3.8%11 km99 km+27.876.9 Tom Green, TX$8.6B+6.8%+0.0%$52.9k$67.6k8.543.4%-1.0%92 km444 km+6.577.3 Kennebec, ME$8.6B+8.0%+0.8%$56.8k$61.2k—2.9%-4.5%1 km56 km+10.175.2 Clark, IN$8.6B+10.1%+1.3%$51.8k$58.5k0.833.6%-2.1%5 km12 km+8.081.4 Madison, TN$8.5B+8.4%+0.4%$56.5k$58.9k0.253.5%-3.6%6 km64 km+13.192.1 Kankakee, IL$8.5B+6.9%-0.4%$53.2k$55.1k0.154.9%-3.7%2 km42 km+9.588.2 Cumberland, NJ$8.5B+6.3%+0.4%$55.8k$50.8k0.816.2%-6.8%47 km28 km+27.582.6 Laramie, WY$8.4B+9.6%+0.2%$58.7k$66.0k2.062.8%-1.4%14 km698 km+0.776.7 Eau Claire, WI$8.4B+6.6%+0.6%$56.4k$62.8k—2.6%-3.4%5 km68 km+5.878.3

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 451–475 of 1,484

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies