Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Mining & energy

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Mining & energy Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,484 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Burleigh, ND$7.8B+7.2%+1.0%$60.9k$75.7k0.951.7%-0.9%16 km558 km+17.185.1 Story, IA$7.8B+7.2%+0.7%$61.2k$56.4k1.092.6%-1.1%9 km211 km+26.668.8 Midland, MI$7.8B+7.1%+0.1%$70.1k$67.2k—5.0%-5.3%30 km40 km+5.771.9 Portsmouth (Independent City), VA$7.8B+4.5%-0.3%$67.0k$50.6k—4.4%-4.1%4 km1 km+4.554.0 Whitfield, GA$7.7B+7.7%+0.7%$52.3k$49.7k—3.3%-6.0%3 km39 km+19.981.5 Lycoming, PA$7.7B+7.2%-0.3%$54.1k$55.8k2.153.9%-2.5%13 km89 km+4.179.6 Coweta, GA$7.7B+9.2%+1.9%$51.2k$65.1k—3.0%-3.9%0 km178 km+11.065.6 Wichita, TX$7.7B+6.3%-0.0%$50.3k$57.9k4.163.8%-1.8%14 km365 km+8.981.9 LaSalle, IL$7.7B+6.7%-0.4%$55.3k$57.5k4.524.9%-4.4%3 km2 km+5.586.1 Bossier, LA$7.7B+9.9%+0.5%$51.1k$59.1k9.574.0%-0.0%14 km36 km+20.082.5 Carver, MN$7.6B+8.3%+1.2%$66.9k$96.1k—3.7%+0.7%29 km35 km+7.459.7 Humboldt, CA$7.6B+6.9%-0.7%$53.1k$62.0k—4.3%+1.0%125 km27 km+3.796.8 Parker, TX$7.6B+12.8%+4.7%$55.4k$75.3k6.183.5%-1.6%6 km380 km+5.981.1 Sumter, FL$7.6B+15.8%+4.3%$55.7k$76.4k0.977.6%+1.3%4 km67 km+3.887.6 Upton, TX$7.6B+36.8%-1.5%$84.0k$96.0k106.571.9%—54 km566 km+3.87.7 Williams, ND$7.5B+13.7%-0.3%$87.1k$76.2k75.632.3%+0.2%156 km743 km+15.653.7 Grand Traverse, MI$7.5B+8.9%+0.3%$57.4k$71.7k0.973.9%-3.7%68 km12 km+2.465.6 Eaton, MI$7.4B+8.1%+0.0%$58.7k$56.3k0.074.5%-3.1%2 km107 km+9.467.6 Cole, MO$7.4B+6.9%+0.4%$53.3k$64.6k0.592.9%-4.9%51 km13 km+8.973.4 St. Clair, MI$7.4B+6.8%-0.0%$54.3k$57.9k—5.3%-3.8%4 km18 km+2.782.0 Salem, NJ$7.4B+6.2%+0.4%$65.3k$60.0k—5.1%-6.8%15 km11 km+7.676.5 Hardin, KY$7.3B+7.4%+0.4%$52.5k$58.7k—5.6%-3.8%10 km38 km+8.475.5 Hancock, OH$7.3B+7.5%-0.1%$62.4k$70.1k—2.6%-0.8%2 km70 km+15.354.1 Wright, MN$7.3B+7.8%+2.2%$53.5k$66.6k0.323.8%-0.9%19 km57 km+7.168.4 Craighead, AR$7.3B+8.5%+1.0%$50.5k$50.7k—3.5%-1.3%3 km63 km+6.391.8

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Portsmouth (Independent City), VA

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Grand Traverse, MI

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 501–525 of 1,484

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies