Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

3,043 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Dallas, IA$11.1B+12.1%+3.4%$74.1k$85.1k0.292.6%-1.3%16 km162 km+17.560.6 Bibb, GA$11.1B+6.4%+0.0%$53.2k$50.9k0.384.2%-5.1%2 km249 km+8.878.5 Broomfield, CO*$11.0B+6.7%+1.3%$109.5k$93.0k0.393.6%+0.1%5 km774 km+17.934.7 Saginaw, MI$11.0B+6.0%-0.3%$57.3k$52.7k0.906.1%-4.5%14 km16 km+3.788.5 Scott, MN$11.0B+11.8%+1.0%$59.4k$84.9k1.923.6%+1.5%19 km21 km+15.376.6 Jackson, MS$10.9B+10.5%+0.6%$58.2k$50.5k2.163.3%-1.9%11 km8 km+11.592.3 Rock, WI$10.8B+8.1%+0.3%$57.2k$58.8k1.333.1%-4.3%7 km100 km+4.786.4 Clarke, GA$10.8B+7.4%+0.4%$55.9k$46.7k0.282.8%-4.8%33 km196 km+28.367.0 Ellis, TX$10.8B+12.5%+4.6%$55.5k$58.8k2.003.9%-2.2%6 km298 km+5.181.6 Wood, OH$10.7B+8.9%+0.2%$54.4k$62.6k1.042.9%-2.1%0 km30 km+7.965.7 Coconino, AZ$10.7B+9.0%-0.1%$52.1k$63.8k0.365.0%-3.4%66 km592 km+11.594.2 Rockingham + Harrisonburg, VA*$10.7B+7.0%——$53.7k———————Clermont, OH$10.6B+3.1%+0.7%$55.9k$66.2k0.642.7%-7.5%12 km14 km+7.177.9 Anderson, SC$10.6B+8.5%+1.6%$49.3k$53.0k0.733.6%-4.8%8 km188 km+7.987.2 Gregg, TX$10.5B+8.6%+0.4%$57.2k$62.3k0.984.7%-2.4%5 km113 km+8.387.0 Ulster, NY$10.5B+7.2%+0.2%$58.5k$69.1k1.403.6%-4.1%17 km21 km+13.887.7 St. Mary's, MD$10.4B+5.7%+0.5%$82.1k$73.3k0.433.2%-2.7%63 km14 km+6.342.6 Kenosha, WI$10.4B+7.6%-0.1%$56.0k$62.3k0.653.1%-4.0%7 km18 km+8.385.0 Medina, OH$10.4B+8.0%+0.2%$56.1k$73.7k0.562.7%-3.2%7 km43 km+4.469.0 Hendricks, IN$10.4B+8.3%+2.1%$51.4k$65.0k1.792.7%-2.7%12 km149 km+14.276.8 Hampshire, MA$10.4B+6.3%+2.6%$60.4k$65.4k1.153.7%-7.5%2 km66 km+18.469.9 Aiken, SC$10.4B+8.2%+1.3%$60.7k$56.7k—3.7%-5.4%14 km149 km+6.684.2 Rankin, MS$10.2B+9.0%+0.6%$51.2k$60.0k0.922.5%-0.8%1 km79 km+10.185.0 Spotsylvania + Fredericksburg, VA*$10.2B+10.6%——$67.9k———————Hutchinson, TX$10.2B+43.8%-0.9%$73.8k$55.5k—4.0%-3.4%69 km507 km+1.067.7

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Broomfield, CO*

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Rockingham + Harrisonburg, VA*

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Spotsylvania + Fredericksburg, VA*

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 401–425 of 3,043

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies