Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Management

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Management Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

313 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Brazoria, TX$23.4B+9.5%+2.4%$67.1k$60.7k0.164.7%-2.0%47 km7 km+13.693.6 Sussex, DE$23.4B+12.9%+3.3%$52.8k$73.6k0.124.2%-1.9%104 km20 km+15.694.1 Spartanburg, SC$23.0B+8.3%+2.9%$56.6k$55.9k0.913.9%-5.5%0 km202 km+16.590.6 Horry, SC$22.8B+11.6%+4.0%$45.8k$53.9k0.214.4%-4.9%67 km67 km+16.498.2 Thurston, WA$21.6B+9.7%+0.5%$68.2k$69.3k0.194.5%-0.6%8 km15 km+8.294.5 Santa Cruz, CA$21.1B+6.7%-1.0%$65.3k$93.6k0.695.1%+0.9%29 km53 km+7.897.8 New Hanover, NC$21.0B+9.7%+1.8%$58.9k$69.7k0.463.2%-4.0%5 km3 km+12.696.1 Northampton, PA$21.0B+6.9%+0.8%$57.5k$69.3k0.644.1%-5.0%12 km72 km+14.190.0 Alachua, FL$20.9B+8.5%+0.9%$61.4k$58.9k0.625.3%-3.0%6 km65 km+28.490.3 Whatcom, WA$20.6B+10.1%+0.8%$62.0k$65.6k0.264.5%-1.9%51 km57 km+11.491.0 Luzerne, PA$20.6B+7.2%+0.4%$54.1k$55.1k0.245.0%-6.4%3 km108 km+21.691.6 Yolo, CA$20.5B+6.2%+0.6%$73.0k$71.0k0.574.8%+0.7%4 km32 km+34.191.4 Osceola, FL$20.4B+13.8%+4.5%$50.1k$49.1k0.054.7%-3.4%44 km64 km+81.692.0 Genesee, MI$20.2B+5.8%-0.3%$53.9k$53.6k0.596.1%-2.8%2 km51 km+6.292.2 Montgomery, AL$19.9B+7.8%-0.3%$59.1k$57.3k0.343.7%-0.3%15 km66 km+20.491.8 Lubbock, TX$19.8B+7.1%+1.1%$52.9k$55.8k0.313.6%-1.0%2 km627 km+15.896.2 Lafayette, LA$19.8B+8.3%+1.3%$56.4k$69.5k0.463.8%+3.1%5 km7 km+22.295.2 Lexington, SC$19.8B+8.3%+1.6%$53.3k$64.1k0.383.3%-4.0%3 km151 km+14.890.9 Atlantic, NJ$19.4B+8.9%+0.4%$57.8k$63.2k0.625.1%-8.0%54 km23 km+22.693.0 Okaloosa, FL$19.0B+8.5%+0.9%$59.5k$66.2k0.044.3%-1.2%3 km21 km+29.692.5 Winnebago, IL$18.8B+7.9%-0.2%$57.5k$55.2k0.485.0%-6.3%16 km86 km+14.892.4 McLennan, TX$18.5B+8.9%+0.9%$57.6k$56.9k0.394.0%-1.3%7 km256 km+8.091.2 Calcasieu, LA$18.4B+11.4%-1.1%$60.6k$56.1k0.084.5%+3.2%2 km4 km+13.995.7 Kitsap, WA$18.3B+7.5%+0.4%$67.7k$77.6k0.394.5%+0.4%26 km6 km+9.492.3 Washington, AR$18.2B+9.1%+2.0%$56.1k$54.8k1.143.0%-4.7%2 km62 km+27.092.3

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Spartanburg, SC

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

New Hanover, NC

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Northampton, PA

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Management

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 201–225 of 313

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies