Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Utilities

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Utilities Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

756 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Clinton, OH$3.1B+7.4%+0.0%$61.3k$55.9k—2.7%-5.4%12 km63 km+9.334.0 Elmore, AL$3.1B+10.2%+0.9%$45.0k$55.5k1.762.8%-2.5%26 km70 km+2.872.2 Loudon, TN$3.1B+7.7%+3.2%$53.7k$73.6k—2.7%-5.3%6 km2 km+12.868.4 Windham, VT$3.1B+5.8%-0.2%$55.6k$63.3k0.592.7%-5.6%15 km85 km+2.556.9 Sagadahoc, ME$3.1B+10.4%+0.6%$60.2k$71.5k0.042.5%-3.4%8 km6 km+9.823.3 Knox, OH$3.1B+9.4%+0.3%$54.6k$58.3k0.792.7%-4.9%25 km112 km+4.461.0 Dodge, NE$3.1B+8.0%+0.6%$51.8k$62.5k—2.7%-2.2%52 km46 km+22.167.4 Brookings, SD$3.1B+8.0%+1.8%$54.4k$66.8k0.871.9%-0.5%3 km217 km+50.050.1 DeKalb, AL$3.1B+11.2%+0.7%$49.1k$45.2k—3.0%-3.3%5 km29 km+15.180.4 Morgan, IN$3.1B+11.2%+0.8%$48.0k$59.7k3.063.0%-2.2%6 km122 km+4.063.5 Jefferson, WV$3.0B+12.7%+1.5%$59.4k$70.5k—2.9%-2.0%17 km88 km+7.647.8 Effingham, GA$3.0B+8.0%+3.0%$52.2k$53.6k2.622.5%-6.5%23 km29 km+5.059.1 Monroe, WI$3.0B+5.9%+0.1%$51.6k$55.3k0.742.5%-4.7%1 km52 km+6.978.8 Grant, WI$3.0B+7.1%+0.2%$45.5k$54.3k0.692.7%-4.8%108 km29 km+3.861.1 Huron, OH$3.0B+5.4%-0.1%$52.1k$52.1k—2.9%-4.9%20 km28 km+6.750.3 Dickson, TN$3.0B+8.6%+1.5%$48.9k$59.6k—2.5%-1.7%15 km28 km+4.253.5 Madison, OH$3.0B+10.3%+1.1%$49.9k$56.0k—2.4%-3.7%6 km125 km+4.024.9 Christian, MO$3.0B+11.1%+1.8%$42.5k$56.1k0.993.0%-3.1%31 km183 km+4.466.5 Bedford, TN$2.9B+9.8%+2.0%$50.4k$52.4k—3.0%-3.1%22 km76 km+17.669.2 Marion, IA$2.9B+5.9%+0.4%$64.3k$66.9k0.302.4%-2.2%39 km166 km+2.734.4 Queen Anne's, MD$2.9B+10.9%+1.8%$54.5k$86.4k—2.9%-1.2%42 km24 km+13.035.6 Franklin, VT$2.9B+5.2%+0.5%$59.2k$60.6k0.662.4%-6.6%12 km39 km+2.129.2 Shelby, IN$2.8B+9.1%+0.3%$55.7k$58.1k0.562.9%-3.4%3 km93 km+9.643.4 Stanly, NC$2.8B+10.3%+1.9%$44.4k$54.2k0.422.9%-3.0%35 km195 km+8.958.8 Lamar, MS$2.8B+10.5%+1.0%$42.7k$54.5k1.753.0%-2.0%15 km95 km+5.865.0

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Queen Anne's, MD

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 201–225 of 756

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies