Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Utilities

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Utilities Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

3,127 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

St. Lucie, FL$16.7B+11.2%+4.3%$51.3k$57.0k2.205.1%-2.4%6 km17 km+24.596.1 Deschutes, OR$16.7B+10.6%+1.4%$62.4k$86.2k1.224.4%+1.8%143 km185 km+5.684.9 Smith, TX$16.7B+9.0%+1.6%$55.6k$69.9k0.633.9%-0.9%8 km154 km+9.384.2 Saratoga, NY$16.6B+7.6%+0.4%$66.9k$86.8k0.763.0%-2.8%9 km45 km+6.173.0 Madison, IL$16.6B+10.8%-0.2%$55.1k$62.7k1.553.9%-2.9%2 km17 km+3.993.4 Ector, TX$16.5B+11.2%+0.8%$72.7k$62.3k0.703.9%+1.5%11 km634 km+36.982.8 Chittenden, VT$16.4B+8.0%+0.2%$70.3k$80.5k0.822.1%-3.3%3 km11 km+14.763.9 Forsyth, GA$16.3B+10.1%+2.5%$62.2k$87.7k1.102.5%-3.3%18 km132 km+23.986.1 Pinal, AZ$16.3B+12.8%+4.6%$56.0k$50.8k0.964.8%-1.5%26 km539 km+18.293.8 Martin, TX$16.2B+47.4%+0.1%$70.0k$110.4k7.672.9%—23 km616 km+20.820.0 St. Clair, IL$16.1B+7.7%-0.6%$55.0k$61.7k1.584.3%-3.2%12 km22 km+5.894.9 Webb, TX$16.1B+10.8%+1.2%$44.9k$44.2k0.524.5%-2.5%10 km178 km+48.489.2 Lower Connecticut River Valley, CT*$16.1B—+0.5%$63.3k$87.3k1.754.1%———+13.183.8 McHenry, IL$16.0B+8.0%+0.5%$53.5k$72.2k0.564.4%-4.3%21 km52 km+5.290.8 Brazos, TX$15.7B+9.7%+1.4%$52.3k$53.0k0.173.6%-2.7%53 km125 km+28.588.4 Olmsted, MN$15.7B+6.7%+0.4%$75.8k$74.9k0.363.4%-0.7%7 km52 km+17.282.3 Lake, OH$15.7B+7.0%-0.0%$56.9k$66.6k1.712.8%-2.8%2 km7 km+7.777.4 Sangamon, IL$15.7B+8.3%-0.3%$65.1k$63.6k0.724.3%-2.7%2 km65 km+9.491.7 Vanderburgh, IN$15.6B+7.9%+0.1%$54.8k$63.0k1.693.2%-1.7%10 km6 km+12.091.3 Wyandotte, KS$15.5B+7.3%+0.1%$64.7k$42.9k—4.4%-4.9%1 km11 km+45.389.4 Rensselaer, NY$15.5B+11.2%-0.1%$73.3k$64.5k3.013.7%-3.7%15 km16 km+12.382.2 Champaign, IL$15.4B+7.1%+0.4%$60.7k$59.9k0.684.0%-4.3%1 km132 km+58.990.5 Hinds, MS$15.4B+4.6%-1.6%$57.0k$54.4k3.373.8%+1.0%10 km40 km+15.594.3 Hays, TX$15.3B+13.9%+4.8%$53.1k$67.5k0.503.6%+2.3%17 km174 km+15.390.6 Chesapeake (Independent City), VA$15.2B+7.4%+0.5%$56.3k$65.8k0.253.6%-2.0%9 km6 km+7.380.9

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Lower Connecticut River Valley, CT*

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Vanderburgh, IN

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Chesapeake (Independent City), VA

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 301–325 of 3,127

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies