Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Environmental consulting

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Environmental consulting Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,178 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Woodford, KY$1.6B+9.4%+0.7%$50.7k$69.2k—3.7%-2.6%13 km34 km+22.040.0 De Witt, IL$1.6B+6.7%-0.3%$66.2k$61.7k—3.8%-2.8%21 km77 km-0.229.3 Barton, KS$1.6B+5.9%-0.5%$47.4k$61.1k—3.9%-4.5%42 km341 km+4.160.3 Grand, CO$1.6B+14.2%+0.8%$50.7k$81.3k0.953.3%+1.0%49 km853 km+17.650.2 Orange, VA$1.6B+7.5%+1.9%$48.4k$66.3k—3.5%-3.1%34 km72 km+5.025.6 Pottawatomie, KS$1.6B+4.9%+1.4%$49.1k$65.5k—3.4%-3.4%35 km112 km+7.330.9 Pickens, GA$1.6B+11.0%+2.3%$53.8k$66.7k—2.7%-2.1%11 km96 km+2.934.8 Gage, NE$1.6B+11.5%+0.0%$46.8k$81.0k—2.4%+2.4%62 km85 km+0.840.6 Bremer, IA$1.6B+8.0%+0.3%$50.9k$62.7k—2.7%-2.9%33 km97 km+3.724.6 Clinton, IL$1.6B+8.5%+0.1%$47.9k$64.7k—3.2%-3.4%20 km57 km+5.365.6 Mono, CA$1.6B+12.1%-1.0%$50.9k$75.0k—3.5%-1.8%152 km212 km+22.046.5 Gunnison, CO$1.6B+9.6%+0.7%$52.3k$75.2k1.973.9%-3.3%101 km982 km+9.745.0 Inyo, CA$1.6B+6.4%-0.9%$58.3k$72.8k6.543.7%-3.7%183 km282 km+3.179.3 Dawson, GA$1.6B+14.0%+5.8%$40.3k$64.7k—2.7%-3.6%22 km109 km+6.221.9 Pierce, WI$1.5B+5.8%+0.6%$45.7k$62.9k—3.0%-1.7%24 km18 km+1.642.3 Clay, IA$1.5B+9.6%+0.3%$51.8k$69.3k—2.5%+0.5%62 km124 km+8.136.4 Dickinson, IA$1.5B+10.4%+0.4%$45.1k$84.2k—2.6%-2.3%29 km145 km+2.936.3 Lavaca, TX$1.5B+12.4%+0.2%$47.8k$72.7k—3.5%-3.8%34 km65 km+2.078.9 Morgan, GA$1.5B+11.5%+2.1%$49.9k$67.5k—2.5%-4.0%3 km222 km+4.119.4 Redwood, MN$1.5B+14.5%-0.3%$51.3k$82.9k—3.8%+0.3%85 km156 km+3.535.1 Plumas, CA$1.5B+11.3%-1.3%$57.2k$71.6k—5.6%+1.0%78 km168 km+5.986.4 Richland, ND$1.5B+15.6%+0.2%$52.4k$68.5k—2.0%-1.1%9 km318 km+1.635.3 Tillamook, OR$1.5B+2.4%-0.0%$50.7k$64.7k—4.9%+0.4%73 km74 km+6.781.3 Chugach Census Area, AK*$1.5B+2.7%-1.8%$73.8k$74.4k—4.9%———+4.719.6 Tyler, WV$1.5B+16.8%-1.2%$57.2k$63.2k—4.1%—47 km15 km-0.135.6

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Pottawatomie, KS

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Chugach Census Area, AK*

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Environmental consulting

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 701–725 of 1,178

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies