Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,178 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Hancock, IN$4.9B+9.3%+2.6%$54.9k$68.3k0.712.8%-2.6%0 km113 km+4.544.0 Teton, WY$4.9B+14.3%-0.0%$77.0k$532.9k0.852.6%—124 km574 km+27.070.6 Glasscock, TX$4.9B+37.8%+0.6%$70.1k$140.6k—2.5%—37 km554 km+5.34.3 Sherburne, MN$4.9B+7.6%+1.4%$55.7k$61.7k2.203.9%-1.7%14 km62 km+6.553.6 Washington, OK$4.8B+16.6%+0.6%$60.3k$126.7k0.695.1%+11.1%54 km49 km+6.676.1 Lincoln, NC$4.7B+10.8%+2.8%$53.0k$64.8k1.473.2%-3.1%22 km242 km+8.373.8 Wood, WV$4.7B+6.4%-0.4%$53.1k$60.6k1.773.9%-0.6%0 km4 km+1.579.8 Adams, PA$4.7B+4.8%+0.8%$52.9k$60.2k0.723.4%-4.2%30 km74 km+6.267.5 Mendocino, CA$4.7B+6.4%-0.7%$51.9k$62.4k3.144.6%+2.2%102 km160 km+10.994.3 Island, WA$4.7B+6.8%-0.3%$55.1k$74.1k1.534.7%-1.2%23 km8 km+6.878.0 Adams, IL$4.7B+7.6%-0.5%$52.8k$62.4k0.973.3%-2.7%10 km20 km+1.164.2 Sullivan, NY$4.5B+8.4%+0.8%$56.3k$60.6k1.533.8%-6.3%40 km67 km+22.378.3 Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK$4.5B+9.2%+2.2%$55.2k$64.0k1.644.3%-3.2%31 km118 km+2.293.3 Buffalo, NE$4.5B+8.2%+0.5%$50.9k$72.7k0.212.3%-2.5%21 km261 km+7.266.0 Gibson, IN$4.5B+6.8%-0.0%$62.6k$60.6k0.632.7%-3.1%14 km37 km+4.648.0 DeWitt, TX$4.4B+18.4%+0.6%$55.3k$75.6k—4.8%-1.5%64 km49 km+7.983.9 McKenzie, ND$4.4B+13.0%+0.0%$90.1k$83.0k—2.0%-2.4%90 km747 km+5.625.0 Summit, CO$4.3B+12.6%+0.3%$55.6k$112.8k0.454.0%+0.2%4 km872 km+43.360.2 Cass, MO$4.3B+9.2%+1.3%$46.8k$62.7k2.333.0%-2.5%1 km55 km+1.074.9 Belknap, NH$4.3B+8.4%+0.5%$54.5k$85.3k1.312.4%-5.4%14 km67 km-0.157.4 Columbia, WI$4.3B+9.6%-0.2%$51.1k$76.0k0.592.7%-1.1%12 km119 km+6.381.4 La Plata, CO$4.3B+9.2%+0.6%$59.6k$81.0k1.243.2%-1.8%207 km977 km+2.975.2 Floyd, IN$4.3B+9.3%+0.4%$53.3k$69.8k1.173.5%-3.0%2 km8 km+5.175.4 Wise, TX$4.2B+11.3%+4.2%$60.1k$60.1k—3.7%-2.5%41 km335 km+3.259.0 Fauquier, VA$4.2B+8.2%+1.0%$62.9k$90.6k1.523.0%-1.8%12 km50 km+7.647.7

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 476–500 of 1,178

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies