Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,178 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Salem, NJ$7.4B+6.2%+0.4%$65.3k$60.0k1.515.1%-6.8%15 km11 km+7.676.5 Hancock, OH$7.3B+7.5%-0.1%$62.4k$70.1k0.672.6%-0.8%2 km70 km+15.354.1 Wright, MN$7.3B+7.8%+2.2%$53.5k$66.6k1.433.8%-0.9%19 km57 km+7.168.4 Flathead, MT$7.2B+11.2%+2.2%$54.9k$73.8k0.653.0%-2.4%136 km305 km+3.086.5 Cecil, MD$7.2B+8.6%+0.7%$60.6k$61.2k0.603.8%-3.9%7 km12 km+5.558.6 Chelan, WA$7.1B+10.0%+0.6%$54.2k$72.7k1.284.6%-0.8%77 km100 km+24.490.9 Maury, TN$7.1B+12.1%+3.0%$60.8k$60.9k1.604.5%-3.4%16 km63 km+6.779.3 Ozaukee, WI$7.1B+6.7%+0.6%$58.2k$109.9k0.662.6%-2.3%2 km7 km+7.150.3 Karnes, TX$7.0B+21.7%+0.4%$67.6k$83.3k—4.0%—46 km87 km+17.658.4 McCracken, KY$7.0B+11.2%-0.1%$55.6k$71.0k2.384.7%+1.0%4 km0 km+5.689.7 Eagle, CO$6.9B+12.5%-0.5%$63.1k$137.7k0.954.6%+0.7%6 km918 km+20.076.2 Craven, NC$6.9B+7.2%+0.6%$53.1k$61.9k0.553.7%-4.7%62 km3 km+5.293.6 Natrona, WY$6.9B+7.4%-0.0%$58.9k$79.9k0.722.7%-1.0%38 km852 km-0.868.9 Fairfield, OH$6.8B+8.4%+1.3%$49.7k$61.2k1.132.6%-4.7%22 km97 km+10.172.6 Warren, NY$6.8B+4.7%-0.1%$57.1k$70.2k0.343.7%-4.3%9 km92 km+3.262.3 Fond du Lac, WI$6.7B+5.9%+0.1%$57.0k$62.3k0.532.6%-6.4%1 km62 km+15.176.3 Sussex, NJ$6.7B+6.6%+0.6%$57.5k$77.7k2.343.8%-6.1%24 km61 km+5.977.4 Allegan, MI$6.7B+7.7%+0.4%$59.2k$60.5k0.744.2%-4.2%23 km29 km+5.468.5 Campbell, WY$6.6B+5.3%+0.5%$66.4k$64.4k1.582.6%-2.6%5 km767 km+2.656.1 Northwest Hills, CT*$6.5B—+0.5%$56.6k$83.4k—4.3%———+13.579.6 Walton, FL$6.4B+14.0%+4.4%$54.6k$94.6k1.504.2%-0.5%6 km17 km+14.988.6 Walworth, WI$6.4B+8.2%+0.2%$49.4k$70.8k1.102.5%-2.9%1 km60 km+7.774.8 Boone, IN$6.4B+12.1%+2.5%$54.0k$101.5k1.532.7%-3.0%2 km170 km+6.243.2 Henderson, NC$6.4B+10.0%+1.0%$52.5k$63.7k0.763.0%-1.5%3 km141 km+15.883.8 Lafourche, LA$6.3B+12.3%-0.5%$64.8k$64.6k2.154.1%+5.1%37 km3 km+7.191.3

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Fond du Lac, WI

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Northwest Hills, CT*

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 401–425 of 1,178

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies