Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Utilities

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Utilities Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

910 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

New York, NY$1.0T+6.8%-0.3%$157.2k$217.1k0.654.3%—3 km2 km+54.798.8 Los Angeles, CA$1.0T+7.0%-0.6%$80.6k$83.9k0.805.2%-1.0%11 km28 km+28.8100.0 Harris, TX$592.8B+11.1%+1.4%$84.9k$80.0k1.784.6%+2.5%1 km0 km+61.099.9 Cook, IL$546.4B+7.4%-0.4%$83.9k$80.0k0.605.3%-2.8%4 km4 km+38.3100.0 King, WA$477.2B+8.8%+0.5%$120.5k$128.7k0.834.7%+1.6%0 km2 km+56.299.7 Santa Clara, CA$438.5B+6.5%-0.3%$174.7k$157.6k0.513.4%+0.1%18 km55 km+60.799.7 Maricopa, AZ$419.3B+10.3%+1.2%$70.3k$72.2k0.844.1%-0.3%12 km435 km+25.199.9 Dallas, TX$389.4B+8.8%+0.5%$86.3k$85.0k0.684.2%-0.1%0 km299 km+58.399.7 Orange, CA$351.8B+7.0%-0.2%$77.9k$94.0k0.403.5%-2.9%1 km16 km+23.699.8 San Diego, CA$331.9B+7.7%-0.1%$79.6k$84.3k0.933.9%-2.1%21 km44 km+17.699.7 San Francisco, CA$268.3B+5.7%-1.6%$167.1k$171.5k1.663.3%+2.6%3 km3 km+40.499.5 Miami-Dade, FL$260.8B+11.7%+1.1%$74.2k$78.6k0.652.6%-3.6%38 km6 km+124.299.6 Fulton, GA$243.6B+6.7%+0.5%$96.0k$111.2k1.423.3%-2.6%2 km159 km+29.395.8 Middlesex, MA$240.7B+7.2%+0.6%$107.1k$112.0k0.793.8%-2.0%9 km28 km+53.196.9 San Mateo, CA$217.0B+9.2%-0.7%$174.3k$179.7k0.413.1%+1.2%5 km14 km+46.499.2 Travis, TX$202.7B+11.2%+1.5%$91.0k$98.9k0.413.5%+5.9%7 km188 km+53.097.7 Clark, NV$195.9B+12.1%+1.2%$62.0k$67.0k0.595.3%-1.2%7 km387 km+23.999.6 Hennepin, MN$193.6B+7.6%-0.1%$87.4k$100.4k1.294.0%+1.9%2 km16 km+27.798.3 Suffolk, MA$190.8B+6.8%+0.1%$124.4k$109.4k0.514.1%-0.3%0 km3 km+73.893.5 Mecklenburg, NC$186.1B+10.0%+2.0%$84.8k$86.1k2.303.6%-3.1%1 km241 km+53.297.1 District of Columbia, DC$184.3B+5.8%+0.7%$117.9k$111.2k0.746.0%+3.9%0 km4 km+39.497.6 Alameda, CA$182.5B+6.2%-0.7%$94.7k$111.3k0.493.8%+3.1%0 km27 km+43.099.8 Tarrant, TX$178.0B+10.2%+1.3%$69.5k$69.9k0.474.0%+0.5%2 km346 km+31.399.1 Broward, FL$173.7B+10.3%+0.9%$69.2k$74.5k0.264.4%-2.6%1 km3 km+73.899.5 Orange, FL$160.4B+12.2%+1.5%$64.8k$62.9k0.394.4%-2.3%6 km58 km+78.498.4

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Los Angeles, CA

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Santa Clara, CA

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

San Francisco, CA

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Mecklenburg, NC

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

District of Columbia, DC

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 1–25 of 910

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies