Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Utilities

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Utilities Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

3,061 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Granville, NC$4.9B+7.7%+0.6%$56.0k$54.8k—3.3%-3.7%5 km153 km+5.159.4 Clinton, NY$4.9B+6.7%-0.6%$58.4k$57.3k0.963.9%-3.6%16 km19 km+6.968.8 Jefferson, WI$4.9B+7.6%+0.1%$51.2k$60.9k0.422.5%-3.6%7 km66 km+7.575.8 Hancock, IN$4.9B+9.3%+2.6%$54.9k$68.3k0.792.8%-2.6%0 km113 km+4.544.0 Teton, WY$4.9B+14.3%-0.0%$77.0k$532.9k—2.6%—124 km574 km+27.070.6 Glasscock, TX$4.9B+37.8%+0.6%$70.1k$140.6k—2.5%—37 km554 km+5.34.3 Greenwood, SC$4.9B+11.9%+0.3%$50.8k$49.1k0.274.5%-4.1%45 km230 km+7.372.7 Sherburne, MN$4.9B+7.6%+1.4%$55.7k$61.7k3.703.9%-1.7%14 km62 km+6.553.6 Rogers, OK$4.9B+8.0%+1.5%$56.1k$58.9k0.984.1%-3.9%8 km8 km+3.080.1 Forrest, MS$4.8B+6.8%+0.2%$49.9k$47.9k3.103.3%-3.2%7 km86 km+13.978.1 Lauderdale, MS$4.8B+7.5%-0.7%$45.8k$53.3k1.843.6%-1.1%3 km59 km+7.287.0 Atascosa, TX$4.8B+21.0%+1.8%$61.8k$50.1k3.854.5%-2.8%9 km152 km+1.060.7 Columbiana, OH$4.8B+10.8%-0.5%$47.3k$51.2k0.813.1%-3.3%24 km21 km+0.169.1 Washington, OK$4.8B+16.6%+0.6%$60.3k$126.7k0.985.1%+11.1%54 km49 km+6.676.1 Chemung, NY$4.8B+5.8%-0.9%$58.9k$56.2k—4.0%-3.2%4 km119 km+4.554.8 Washington, OH$4.8B+7.2%-0.4%$57.4k$57.5k1.343.0%-1.3%5 km6 km+2.364.4 Lincoln, NC$4.7B+10.8%+2.8%$53.0k$64.8k0.453.2%-3.1%22 km242 km+8.373.8 Wood, WV$4.7B+6.4%-0.4%$53.1k$60.6k0.923.9%-0.6%0 km4 km+1.579.8 Garland, AR$4.7B+6.6%-0.1%$44.7k$53.6k0.573.8%-3.9%34 km72 km+5.389.3 Northumberland, PA$4.7B+12.4%-0.4%$51.1k$52.0k2.013.8%-5.2%15 km41 km+3.179.2 Adams, PA$4.7B+4.8%+0.8%$52.9k$60.2k0.473.4%-4.2%30 km74 km+6.267.5 Bay, MI$4.7B+5.8%-0.3%$53.5k$55.6k2.885.7%-4.7%2 km13 km+1.478.2 Mendocino, CA$4.7B+6.4%-0.7%$51.9k$62.4k1.694.6%+2.2%102 km160 km+10.994.3 Island, WA$4.7B+6.8%-0.3%$55.1k$74.1k0.994.7%-1.2%23 km8 km+6.878.0 Adams, IL$4.7B+7.6%-0.5%$52.8k$62.4k0.763.3%-2.7%10 km20 km+1.164.2

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Northumberland, PA

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 701–725 of 3,061

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies