Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Mining & energy

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Mining & energy Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

3,061 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Jefferson, MO$6.9B+5.1%+0.6%$48.1k$56.9k0.853.2%-2.4%12 km0 km+1.190.5 Natrona, WY$6.9B+7.4%-0.0%$58.9k$79.9k15.812.7%-1.0%38 km852 km-0.868.9 Linn, OR$6.9B+7.8%+0.7%$54.8k$60.0k0.215.0%-0.1%42 km91 km+2.988.1 Fairfield, OH$6.8B+8.4%+1.3%$49.7k$61.2k0.812.6%-4.7%22 km97 km+10.172.6 Bradford, PA$6.8B+19.9%-0.2%$58.1k$51.8k6.853.8%-2.8%24 km144 km+5.873.1 Wayne, NC$6.8B+7.3%+0.7%$47.1k$54.0k—3.7%-4.2%4 km88 km+24.390.4 Warren, NY$6.8B+4.7%-0.1%$57.1k$70.2k—3.7%-4.3%9 km92 km+3.262.3 Fond du Lac, WI$6.7B+5.9%+0.1%$57.0k$62.3k0.962.6%-6.4%1 km62 km+15.176.3 Buchanan, MO$6.7B+6.2%-0.3%$56.7k$54.3k—3.7%-3.4%1 km10 km+17.674.4 Sussex, NJ$6.7B+6.6%+0.6%$57.5k$77.7k0.923.8%-6.1%24 km61 km+5.977.4 Dorchester, SC$6.7B+11.6%+1.9%$51.1k$54.7k0.033.4%-3.4%10 km35 km+12.193.7 Allegan, MI$6.7B+7.7%+0.4%$59.2k$60.5k0.724.2%-4.2%23 km29 km+5.468.5 Bradley, TN$6.7B+8.0%+1.2%$53.3k$53.0k—3.3%-4.6%5 km18 km+16.773.4 Cabell, WV$6.7B+7.0%-0.7%$55.0k$56.8k0.103.4%-0.5%1 km8 km+2.085.4 Campbell, WY$6.6B+5.3%+0.5%$66.4k$64.4k67.132.6%-2.6%5 km767 km+2.656.1 St. Lawrence, NY$6.6B+7.1%-0.5%$58.9k$50.9k2.184.7%-2.0%72 km41 km+6.377.9 Cochise, AZ$6.6B+5.2%-0.1%$57.0k$55.3k0.505.8%-3.4%36 km697 km+7.792.8 Vigo, IN$6.6B+7.9%+0.0%$51.3k$51.5k0.313.4%-3.5%0 km150 km+10.083.2 Jackson, GA$6.5B+13.9%+5.3%$48.0k$60.0k0.522.9%-3.8%6 km169 km+10.041.9 Schuylkill, PA$6.5B+6.5%+0.3%$52.4k$53.0k3.974.6%-6.8%8 km66 km+5.285.3 Hunt, TX$6.5B+9.8%+4.4%$57.1k$51.0k0.194.3%-3.8%0 km245 km+12.182.2 Lee, MS$6.5B+6.8%+0.0%$49.3k$56.3k—3.3%-2.3%0 km25 km+6.881.3 Northwest Hills, CT*$6.5B—+0.5%$56.6k$83.4k0.604.3%———+13.579.6 Tangipahoa, LA$6.4B+9.8%+1.2%$45.3k$52.2k0.725.1%-1.1%10 km33 km+6.493.3 Walton, FL$6.4B+14.0%+4.4%$54.6k$94.6k0.334.2%-0.5%6 km17 km+14.988.6

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Fond du Lac, WI

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

St. Lawrence, NY

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Northwest Hills, CT*

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 576–600 of 3,061

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies