Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

2,676 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

DeWitt, TX$4.4B+18.4%+0.6%$55.3k$75.6k—4.8%-1.5%64 km49 km+7.983.9 Jefferson, OH$4.4B+4.4%-0.5%$48.7k$51.0k2.763.5%-4.9%35 km11 km+1.666.7 McKenzie, ND$4.4B+13.0%+0.0%$90.1k$83.0k—2.0%-2.4%90 km747 km+5.625.0 Summit, CO$4.3B+12.6%+0.3%$55.6k$112.8k0.454.0%+0.2%4 km872 km+43.360.2 Walton, GA$4.3B+10.9%+3.2%$54.1k$55.4k2.143.0%-5.0%19 km193 km+7.355.0 Bastrop, TX$4.3B+12.0%+4.3%$50.8k$49.9k0.973.7%-0.7%44 km149 km+12.481.2 Curry, NM$4.3B+6.7%-0.5%$45.2k$59.0k0.563.8%-0.7%60 km714 km+14.761.8 Cass, MO$4.3B+9.2%+1.3%$46.8k$62.7k2.333.0%-2.5%1 km55 km+1.074.9 Belknap, NH$4.3B+8.4%+0.5%$54.5k$85.3k1.312.4%-5.4%14 km67 km-0.157.4 Cullman, AL$4.3B+9.4%+1.3%$49.7k$53.6k0.803.1%-1.2%0 km50 km+3.281.9 Columbia, WI$4.3B+9.6%-0.2%$51.1k$76.0k0.592.7%-1.1%12 km119 km+6.381.4 La Plata, CO$4.3B+9.2%+0.6%$59.6k$81.0k1.243.2%-1.8%207 km977 km+2.975.2 Lee, NC$4.3B+10.0%+2.1%$52.2k$57.4k0.183.4%-5.0%44 km133 km+29.267.5 Floyd, IN$4.3B+9.3%+0.4%$53.3k$69.8k1.173.5%-3.0%2 km8 km+5.175.4 Wise, TX$4.2B+11.3%+4.2%$60.1k$60.1k—3.7%-2.5%41 km335 km+3.259.0 Livingston, LA$4.2B+5.9%+1.8%$44.9k$53.6k4.473.9%-0.8%4 km34 km+13.894.5 Lenawee, MI$4.2B+7.2%-0.4%$50.6k$53.0k0.375.0%-2.9%33 km47 km+2.969.9 Indiana, PA$4.2B+2.2%+0.0%$54.6k$49.7k1.214.1%-3.7%55 km40 km+5.163.7 Lawrence, PA$4.2B+6.2%-0.5%$51.5k$55.7k1.794.0%-4.9%5 km33 km+1.166.1 Coffee, TN$4.2B+8.0%+1.4%$55.7k$53.2k—3.0%-4.4%0 km67 km+8.063.5 Vermilion, IL$4.2B+6.5%-0.9%$53.0k$52.8k1.175.0%-2.8%6 km141 km+1.778.8 Fauquier, VA$4.2B+8.2%+1.0%$62.9k$90.6k1.523.0%-1.8%12 km50 km+7.647.7 Pope, AR$4.2B+7.7%+0.5%$48.4k$45.6k3.134.5%-2.3%18 km25 km+5.277.8 Mississippi, AR$4.2B+12.2%-1.5%$69.2k$52.9k4.374.1%+0.5%4 km12 km+7.189.2 Worcester, MD$4.1B+10.7%+0.9%$44.3k$73.6k0.674.2%-3.8%135 km18 km+8.668.2

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Mississippi, AR

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 676–700 of 2,676

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies