Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

756 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Wayne, NE$804.4M+13.4%+0.5%$43.2k$55.2k—2.9%-3.6%61 km65 km+12.814.0 Palo Alto, IA$796.3M+14.0%-0.3%$45.9k$65.5k—2.1%-0.4%64 km157 km+3.115.5 Sac, IA$793.7M+13.0%-0.5%$50.1k$75.3k—2.4%-1.0%93 km99 km+2.927.3 Paulding, OH$790.0M+7.0%-0.1%$51.0k$55.8k2.642.5%-4.4%35 km104 km+8.921.2 Franklin, IA$789.8M+8.8%-0.0%$51.8k$65.6k—2.9%+1.5%11 km173 km+19.021.9 Crockett, TX$788.4M+18.0%-2.4%$50.3k$70.1k—3.0%—4 km479 km-9.85.8 Fergus, MT$776.7M+10.2%+0.8%$46.6k$56.8k—2.6%-6.0%167 km599 km+2.645.1 Antelope, NE$776.6M+6.2%+0.3%$45.9k$67.9k—2.3%-9.6%125 km141 km+2.219.5 Archuleta, CO$773.2M+9.5%+1.3%$45.5k$62.6k1.272.9%-2.2%198 km1013 km+3.834.5 Rush, IN$764.1M+6.8%-0.0%$48.9k$60.2k—3.0%-3.3%23 km79 km+2.315.8 Crockett, TN$760.9M+5.7%+0.1%$54.5k$53.9k—2.8%-6.8%25 km46 km+0.052.6 Sevier, AR$758.0M+14.5%+0.1%$41.5k$48.0k—3.0%-0.9%56 km140 km+7.164.9 Guthrie, IA$752.5M+11.9%+0.2%$52.2k$72.9k—2.7%-1.2%21 km125 km+6.126.5 Ida, IA$745.6M+4.5%-0.9%$57.1k$69.3k—2.3%+0.2%62 km72 km+6.818.4 Livingston, MO$741.9M+5.5%+0.2%$43.3k$51.6k—2.9%-3.6%51 km51 km+2.923.0 Pierce, NE$737.8M+22.1%+0.0%$45.6k$112.7k—2.2%+10.2%88 km102 km+9.214.2 Red Willow, NE$736.8M+6.5%-0.7%$45.3k$60.1k—2.4%-3.1%85 km396 km+1.720.3 Sitka City and Borough, AK$734.7M+11.5%-0.1%$61.9k$91.4k—2.7%-0.8%691 km12 km+13.123.8 Grundy, IA$731.7M+8.0%+0.1%$56.4k$64.8k5.332.5%-3.7%39 km146 km+5.713.1 Buffalo, WI$730.9M+7.1%+0.1%$47.9k$59.4k—2.9%-6.1%46 km15 km+1.014.5 Howard, IA$727.4M+12.3%-0.2%$47.4k$66.8k—2.4%-1.0%50 km90 km+5.715.6 Stillwater, MT$725.1M-1.0%+1.2%$77.5k$71.7k—2.8%-3.3%3 km593 km-0.416.8 Box Butte, NE$724.9M+4.8%-0.4%$45.2k$60.8k—2.9%-2.4%114 km551 km+10.621.0 Dewey, OK$719.7M+12.1%-1.2%$68.9k$61.8k—2.6%—53 km295 km-0.215.6 Custer, MT$695.6M+8.9%+0.2%$47.0k$58.9k1.802.2%-2.6%25 km844 km+0.942.1

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Sitka City and Borough, AK

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 451–475 of 756

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies