Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Utilities

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Utilities Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,258 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Cass, MI$1.9B+13.5%-0.0%$51.2k$59.6k—4.9%-4.3%20 km45 km+1.247.7 Wythe, VA$1.9B+5.7%-0.2%$45.2k$49.2k0.443.4%-3.2%4 km137 km+0.448.7 Pulaski, VA$1.9B+9.0%-0.2%$50.7k$53.9k0.523.8%-3.2%1 km129 km+1.845.9 Jefferson, PA$1.9B+5.7%-0.7%$47.5k$51.8k0.763.9%-3.9%2 km52 km+1.057.9 Orleans, NY$1.9B+6.2%-0.1%$55.8k$51.1k0.853.8%-7.2%26 km50 km+8.117.9 Wyoming, PA$1.9B+4.9%-0.2%$59.2k$59.0k—3.9%-3.2%27 km135 km+3.844.8 Jim Wells, TX$1.9B+7.5%-0.0%$47.4k$53.1k0.555.4%-3.2%38 km57 km+4.286.5 Carroll, IA$1.8B+7.7%-0.3%$48.5k$69.8k0.822.2%-1.7%60 km106 km+3.357.6 Miller, AR$1.8B+6.2%-0.1%$49.0k$45.0k1.354.4%-0.3%3 km105 km-0.870.8 Elk, PA$1.8B+6.3%-0.7%$50.5k$56.2k2.193.6%-5.0%32 km96 km+0.845.2 Cumberland, IL$1.8B+20.2%-0.4%$46.7k$104.9k—3.1%-4.2%5 km153 km+0.625.9 Carroll, OH$1.8B+12.5%-0.2%$46.3k$53.5k2.243.1%-3.7%31 km36 km+0.219.9 Humboldt, NV$1.8B+5.2%-0.1%$68.1k$60.4k3.653.5%-2.9%57 km427 km+7.040.8 Custer, OK$1.8B+7.0%-0.2%$49.0k$51.0k2.793.6%-0.9%16 km301 km+3.962.0 Hood River, OR$1.8B+9.4%-0.2%$51.0k$74.8k0.963.9%-1.2%19 km21 km+8.232.1 Garrett, MD$1.8B+7.1%-0.3%$45.1k$62.7k0.913.6%-2.5%17 km60 km+1.016.0 Sargent, ND$1.8B+14.7%-0.8%$68.3k$81.2k—1.8%—61 km360 km+1.37.4 Woodford, IL$1.8B+9.3%-0.1%$53.3k$69.3k—3.5%-2.4%15 km27 km+3.439.9 Washington, MS$1.8B+3.5%-2.0%$42.2k$50.9k1.955.2%-2.4%97 km15 km+0.983.0 Washington, LA$1.8B+13.6%-0.1%$43.6k$46.3k2.614.9%+0.2%46 km50 km+3.685.5 Tuscola, MI$1.8B+7.0%-0.2%$47.8k$49.8k0.545.9%-4.6%37 km38 km+2.273.1 Hale, TX$1.8B+7.5%-0.3%$47.0k$45.0k2.204.2%-2.2%1 km604 km+11.278.4 McCurtain, OK$1.8B+11.0%-0.1%$43.6k$47.7k1.084.8%-1.1%77 km128 km+5.272.0 Harvey, KS$1.8B+6.2%-0.3%$47.0k$56.3k—3.6%-4.1%8 km247 km+1.138.9 Crawford, OH$1.8B+6.2%-0.3%$48.6k$49.9k—3.2%-6.0%38 km68 km+5.635.2

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Utilities

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 376–400 of 1,258

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies