Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,532 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Dunn, ND$1.9B+25.4%-0.7%$84.1k$99.8k—2.2%—53 km699 km+19.710.8 Cheatham, TN$1.9B+11.2%+0.9%$55.7k$64.6k—2.5%-0.8%16 km1 km+4.046.3 Carbon, WY$1.9B+18.0%-0.7%$56.9k$71.7k2.112.8%-0.5%6 km874 km+1.942.7 Ware, GA$1.9B+7.2%+0.2%$44.1k$41.8k1.403.9%-8.7%71 km85 km+11.849.4 Washington, NE$1.9B+8.9%+0.4%$60.8k$75.6k—2.3%-2.6%21 km11 km+1.225.5 Cass, MI$1.9B+13.5%-0.0%$51.2k$59.6k4.074.9%-4.3%20 km45 km+1.247.7 Decatur, IN$1.9B+3.5%+0.0%$54.9k$58.1k—2.9%-3.7%6 km59 km+5.223.1 Wythe, VA$1.9B+5.7%-0.2%$45.2k$49.2k1.963.4%-3.2%4 km137 km+0.448.7 Pulaski, VA$1.9B+9.0%-0.2%$50.7k$53.9k0.223.8%-3.2%1 km129 km+1.845.9 Highland, OH$1.9B+6.9%+0.2%$42.5k$48.0k—3.4%-4.8%42 km55 km+0.743.2 Warren, IA$1.9B+8.1%+1.8%$49.4k$66.6k1.102.7%-1.6%18 km196 km+2.136.1 Botetourt, VA$1.9B+8.8%+0.3%$55.0k$66.8k0.533.2%-4.2%8 km144 km+2.218.1 Wasatch, UT$1.9B+11.6%+1.9%$54.4k$97.4k—3.5%+1.1%43 km825 km+19.633.5 Orleans, NY$1.9B+6.2%-0.1%$55.8k$51.1k—3.8%-7.2%26 km50 km+8.117.9 Butte, ID$1.9B+8.8%+1.4%$110.0k$57.1k—3.8%-0.5%79 km425 km+0.44.4 Wyoming, PA$1.9B+4.9%-0.2%$59.2k$59.0k2.173.9%-3.2%27 km135 km+3.844.8 Washington, IA$1.9B+15.3%+0.1%$45.5k$84.5k0.552.3%+3.7%40 km54 km+5.444.2 Duchesne, UT$1.9B+17.7%+1.3%$55.6k$55.4k—3.5%-2.5%101 km863 km+2.97.6 Lawrence, SD$1.8B+10.5%+2.7%$49.5k$78.6k1.041.7%-1.9%13 km635 km+7.849.3 Elk, PA$1.8B+6.3%-0.7%$50.5k$56.2k1.453.6%-5.0%32 km96 km+0.845.2 Monroe, GA$1.8B+9.2%+2.9%$52.1k$59.1k—3.0%-3.5%2 km259 km+3.518.7 Cumberland, IL$1.8B+20.2%-0.4%$46.7k$104.9k—3.1%-4.2%5 km153 km+0.625.9 Carroll, OH$1.8B+12.5%-0.2%$46.3k$53.5k0.893.1%-3.7%31 km36 km+0.219.9 Chester, SC$1.8B+11.2%+0.2%$55.8k$48.4k—4.8%-3.6%12 km213 km+2.543.2 Humboldt, NV$1.8B+5.2%-0.1%$68.1k$60.4k1.393.5%-2.9%57 km427 km+7.040.8

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 151–175 of 1,532

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies