Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

1,532 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Pecos, TX$2.7B+14.4%-0.9%$60.1k$50.1k1.724.5%+5.3%12 km597 km+10.025.1 Cassia, ID$2.6B+14.8%+1.4%$47.6k$59.4k—3.2%-1.1%27 km534 km+34.943.6 McPherson, KS$2.6B+7.2%-0.1%$57.7k$65.6k—3.1%-1.8%2 km261 km+5.339.2 Knox, ME$2.6B+7.2%+0.2%$52.7k$71.5k0.982.9%-6.5%54 km4 km+4.428.6 Fulton, OH$2.6B+5.3%-0.3%$54.5k$58.5k0.693.0%-3.4%1 km49 km+6.633.6 Dearborn, IN$2.6B+7.2%+0.5%$48.1k$63.5k—3.2%-3.7%12 km12 km+0.745.2 Dunn, WI$2.6B+7.0%+0.3%$51.0k$53.5k—2.8%-5.3%4 km64 km+4.148.8 Oconee, GA$2.6B+11.4%+1.5%$48.5k$91.4k3.182.4%-3.8%30 km203 km+6.119.4 Emmet, MI$2.6B+9.4%-0.1%$54.4k$80.0k—5.1%-4.8%21 km17 km+1.838.1 Warren, VA$2.6B+8.0%+1.0%$49.9k$62.1k—3.3%-2.9%6 km88 km+12.331.6 Noble, IN$2.6B+7.0%+0.3%$48.6k$54.3k0.983.1%-3.0%28 km118 km+8.244.2 Greenlee, AZ$2.5B+12.5%-0.5%$83.2k$58.6k—3.3%—101 km735 km+15.412.4 Yoakum, TX$2.5B+22.8%-0.6%$77.2k$59.6k4.224.1%-0.7%100 km732 km+33.746.1 Green, WI$2.5B+8.2%+0.1%$50.1k$68.1k—2.3%-5.0%48 km79 km+4.846.4 Carroll, KY$2.5B+6.7%+0.6%$70.7k$50.3k2.114.4%-6.1%2 km5 km+5.923.4 Fulton, NY$2.4B+5.3%-0.4%$52.7k$56.8k0.844.1%-5.0%19 km72 km+2.748.6 Ashland, OH$2.4B+6.2%-0.0%$47.5k$53.2k0.612.7%-3.7%0 km66 km+2.046.3 Jefferson, TN$2.4B+7.7%+1.9%$52.6k$51.4k—3.1%-5.7%2 km37 km+4.244.9 Dakota, NE$2.4B+10.8%-0.1%$58.8k$63.6k—2.6%+1.1%12 km15 km+37.836.0 Montrose, CO$2.4B+9.2%+1.1%$50.0k$57.3k2.273.6%-2.5%79 km1005 km+12.449.0 McLeod, MN$2.4B+7.5%+0.1%$54.9k$63.9k1.713.7%-1.3%64 km72 km+7.046.6 Marshall, IN$2.4B+8.5%+0.3%$49.4k$55.4k0.943.0%-3.6%44 km70 km+6.341.6 Wyoming, NY$2.4B+6.3%-0.3%$60.1k$53.6k—3.4%-5.8%32 km54 km+6.841.3 Albany, WY$2.4B+9.0%+1.0%$50.6k$57.3k0.582.3%-1.9%28 km776 km+29.248.5 Barry, MI$2.3B+10.5%+0.6%$49.2k$60.4k0.414.9%-3.9%31 km70 km+3.946.0

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 76–100 of 1,532

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies