Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Waste management & remediation

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Waste management & remediation Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

757 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Palo Alto, IA$796.3M+14.0%-0.3%$45.9k$65.5k—2.1%-0.4%64 km157 km+3.115.5 Paulding, OH$790.0M+7.0%-0.1%$51.0k$55.8k2.642.5%-4.4%35 km104 km+8.921.2 Franklin, IA$789.8M+8.8%-0.0%$51.8k$65.6k—2.9%+1.5%11 km173 km+19.021.9 Crockett, TX$788.4M+18.0%-2.4%$50.3k$70.1k—3.0%—4 km479 km-9.85.8 Grant, KY$784.0M+9.8%+0.7%$49.7k$50.0k—4.4%-3.8%3 km30 km+0.316.3 Barbour, WV$781.1M+18.2%-0.2%$56.3k$44.7k—4.2%—27 km43 km+2.124.0 San Augustine, TX$780.3M+16.3%-0.5%$55.7k$61.4k—5.2%—91 km102 km+2.317.6 Antelope, NE$776.6M+6.2%+0.3%$45.9k$67.9k—2.3%-9.6%125 km141 km+2.219.5 Sherman, OR$774.0M+7.6%+1.7%$60.8k$59.3k—5.1%—31 km32 km+0.52.9 Macon, AL$764.9M+8.0%-1.6%$53.3k$44.8k—4.6%+0.2%8 km110 km+6.923.9 Rush, IN$764.1M+6.8%-0.0%$48.9k$60.2k—3.0%-3.3%23 km79 km+2.315.8 Grainger, TN$753.6M+12.3%+1.6%$51.4k$48.7k—3.1%-3.7%24 km46 km+1.118.6 Pope, MN$750.3M+7.7%+0.3%$54.4k$67.0k—3.8%-4.3%29 km181 km+3.420.5 Ida, IA$745.6M+4.5%-0.9%$57.1k$69.3k—2.3%+0.2%62 km72 km+6.818.4 Wadena, MN$744.5M+8.0%+0.4%$47.4k$52.6k—4.9%-4.2%85 km214 km+4.412.9 Livingston, MO$741.9M+5.5%+0.2%$43.3k$51.6k—2.9%-3.6%51 km51 km+2.923.0 Benzie, MI$740.7M+9.8%+0.7%$43.3k$63.6k—4.9%-8.0%104 km18 km+3.722.7 Pierce, NE$737.8M+22.1%+0.0%$45.6k$112.7k—2.2%+10.2%88 km102 km+9.214.2 Red Willow, NE$736.8M+6.5%-0.7%$45.3k$60.1k—2.4%-3.1%85 km396 km+1.720.3 Tipton, IN$735.9M+3.6%-0.0%$54.3k$55.0k—3.2%-6.7%37 km158 km+4.68.9 Trimble, KY$735.7M+6.3%+0.5%$58.9k$53.3k—4.3%-3.1%13 km8 km+0.811.9 Sitka City and Borough, AK$734.7M+11.5%-0.1%$61.9k$91.4k—2.7%-0.8%691 km12 km+13.123.8 Grundy, IA$731.7M+8.0%+0.1%$56.4k$64.8k5.332.5%-3.7%39 km146 km+5.713.1 Buffalo, WI$730.9M+7.1%+0.1%$47.9k$59.4k—2.9%-6.1%46 km15 km+1.014.5 Howard, IA$727.4M+12.3%-0.2%$47.4k$66.8k—2.4%-1.0%50 km90 km+5.715.6

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

San Augustine, TX

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Sitka City and Borough, AK

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Waste management & remediation

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 151–175 of 757

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies