Economic Atlas — company data × geography

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Home Screener Chat Companies

WORKSPACE

Overview Screener Watchlist Chat Account

EXPLORE

Companies Places Place screener Methodology

Places/Screener · Mining & energy

Counties Metros

US counties

Filters

Views

Growing GDP, shrinking population Engineering hubs Highest per-capita income Overrepresented in Mining & energy Low unemployment, growing business formation Affordability improving (income outpacing home prices)Housing costs outpacing income (community-impact screen)Logistics: near interstate & port High international-migration inflow Highest FEMA natural-hazard risk

Concentration by industry

Agriculture Mining & energy Utilities Construction Wholesale trade Information Finance & insurance Real estate Professional services Management Admin & support Education Health care Arts & recreation Food & accommodation Other services Manufacturing Retail trade Transportation

Deep sectors · QCEW

Waste management & remediation Architectural & engineering Management & technical consulting Engineering services Environmental consulting Remediation services

GDP growth ≥ (per yr)

≥ 2%≥ 4%≥ 6%

Population change ≤

≤ 0%≤ -1%≤ -3%

Min. population

≥ 100k ≥ 500k ≥ 1M

Unemployment ≤ (BLS LAUS, latest)

≤ 3%≤ 5%≤ 8%

Business formation growth ≥ (Census BFS, ’20–’24)

≥ 0%≥ 5%≥ 10%

Affordability (income CAGR − FHFA HPI CAGR)

Improving Strongly improving Worsening

Min. average wage (BLS QCEW)

≥ $50k ≥ $75k ≥ $100k

Min. per-capita income (BEA CAINC1)

≥ $40k ≥ $60k ≥ $80k

Max. distance to interstate (BTS NHS)

≤ 10 km ≤ 25 km ≤ 50 km

Max. distance to port (USACE)

≤ 50 km ≤ 100 km ≤ 250 km

Intl migration ≥ (per 1,000, ’20–’25)

≥ net inflow ≥ +10 ≥ +25

FEMA risk score (0–100, current point)

≥ 50 ≥ 75 ≥ 90 ≤ 25 ≤ 50

Derived from public data — GDP CAGR, location quotient, wage & income, unemployment, formation growth, affordability, transport access, migration, and FEMA risk all computed live. Methodology

719 counties match

Sort:GDP GDP growth Population Pop. growth Wage Income Concentration Unemployment Business formation Affordability Nearest interstate Nearest port Intl migration FEMA risk

CountyGDP ’24GDP CAGRPop ΔAvg wageIncomeLQUnemp.Afford. ΔInterstatePortIntl mig/1kFEMA

Clay, TX$433.1M+18.1%+1.2%$47.5k$58.4k2.803.8%-1.3%30 km339 km+2.214.3 Runnels, TX$432.0M+9.7%-0.4%$46.1k$57.8k4.913.5%+1.0%70 km444 km+0.726.5 Roger Mills, OK$431.0M+12.2%-1.1%$46.5k$54.2k18.313.8%—38 km361 km+5.523.2 Cannon, TN$430.6M+9.9%+1.0%$46.6k$51.6k5.262.6%-4.5%25 km64 km+1.022.9 Weston, WY$429.2M+11.7%+0.2%$49.9k$56.5k18.742.5%+0.8%50 km682 km-0.97.9 Archer, TX$428.7M+11.3%+1.7%$47.3k$69.6k50.503.6%-3.2%37 km387 km+3.97.7 Haskell, TX$427.3M+12.1%+0.1%$38.5k$48.6k2.574.1%—77 km495 km+6.911.7 Harper, KS$420.9M+9.7%-0.3%$45.4k$62.7k5.023.6%-8.3%65 km234 km+3.731.3 Braxton, WV$417.2M+4.9%-0.7%$43.2k$44.7k1.843.3%—2 km79 km+0.236.2 Denali Borough, AK$413.1M+17.4%-0.3%$63.2k$134.4k38.262.5%—54 km109 km+13.628.3 Alfalfa, OK$410.4M+5.6%+0.0%$50.0k$45.9k13.683.6%—87 km237 km+10.340.6 Clarke, MS$408.3M+8.1%-0.5%$42.3k$50.1k22.263.8%+0.4%20 km54 km-0.336.0 Tucker, WV$405.9M+5.6%-0.8%$44.4k$62.6k33.653.8%—60 km65 km+0.212.6 Oldham, TX$404.5M+7.3%+0.4%$48.8k$89.4k19.793.2%—15 km626 km+26.49.7 Pike, AR$401.3M+10.5%-0.3%$41.4k$46.3k3.474.1%—44 km102 km+4.926.6 Grayson, VA$398.0M+7.8%+0.1%$36.8k$43.2k2.523.4%-3.7%29 km165 km+4.324.7 Custer, SD$397.6M+12.2%+2.8%$45.0k$72.7k7.711.9%-6.1%48 km590 km+6.616.3 Wheeler, TX$394.2M+4.5%-0.8%$43.9k$53.3k26.463.8%—19 km419 km+17.241.3 Valley, MT$394.0M+4.0%-0.6%$47.6k$59.9k1.422.6%+0.3%199 km807 km+3.435.9 Sabine, TX$393.8M+12.2%+0.5%$44.7k$49.9k2.106.8%-3.2%76 km85 km+0.622.1 Washita, OK$393.4M+7.4%-0.2%$43.6k$43.1k6.393.5%-1.4%21 km312 km+3.231.9 Jefferson, MT$392.8M+10.0%+2.2%$53.3k$68.3k5.042.5%-3.9%11 km379 km+1.521.6 Amite, MS$389.3M+12.9%-0.4%$44.7k$45.2k5.644.1%+1.4%31 km72 km+2.448.2 Wilson, KS$389.0M+5.3%-0.8%$45.0k$52.6k3.295.4%—93 km138 km+0.018.0 Iron, MO$371.0M-2.7%-0.3%$45.3k$47.1k24.604.1%-5.7%69 km72 km+4.569.5

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Roger Mills, OK

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Denali Borough, AK

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

LQ · Mining & energy

Affordability Δ

Nearest interstate

Intl migration /1k ’20–’25

Showing 601–625 of 719

← Prev Next →

GDP: BEA nominal, 2020–2024. Population & change: Census PEP Vintage 2025. Avg wage: BLS QCEW county annual pay 2023 (CBP payroll÷employment fallback). Income per capita: BEA CAINC1 2024. Location quotient: employment concentration vs. the national base — CBP 2-digit, or BLS QCEW for deep sectors (2023). Unemployment: BLS LAUS, most recent month. Business formation growth: Census BFS county applications, 2020→2024 CAGR (2022+ counts carry Census differential-privacy noise). Affordability: BEA CAINC1 per-capita income CAGR minus FHFA county HPI CAGR, 2020→2024 — positive means incomes are outpacing home prices. Interstate & port distance: county centroid to nearest BTS National Highway System segment / USACE port or dock, computed by Economic Atlas. Intl migration: net international migration per 1,000 residents — Census PEP Vintage 2025 components of change summed over the 2020→2025 window ÷ 2025 population × 1,000; a net census estimate (arrivals minus departures), not an official immigration statistic. FEMA risk: National Risk Index composite (0–100), a current point-in-time release — relative hazard exposure, not a trend. Suppressed cells show “—”, never zero.

Home Screener Chat Companies